On Tue, 06 Mar 2001 13:03:57 MST, Kevin Handy said: > How about adding a command line option instead of a shell variable. > Makes it obvious that this application has something odd about it. > > slashem --insecure No. This is still a "hacker can specify" option, which is a non-starter. The *only* people who should be able to specify are the system administrator (via a config file, etc), and the programmer. /Valdis
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Nils Philippsen
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Paul Davis
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released David Ford
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Kevin Handy
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Dave Benson
- Re: [Slashem-devel] Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Peter Makholm
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
PGP signature