>I have tried gtk--. This seems to be thought of as the standard c++ >binding for gtk+. I cant tell if it is the best since it is the only one >I've tried. The drawback is that it is difficult to install from source, >so you have to get the binary packages. At least I havn't been able to >install from source on any of the machines I've tried it on. >I think it is easy to use, easier than gkt+.
puzzling. i've never seen any mail from anyone on the gtkmm mailing list who had problems with "./configure && make && make install". what problems did you have? installing binary copies of C++ libraries is always a dubious decision. C++ libraries are incompatible with an application if they were compiled by different compilers and/or against different versions of libraries that included lots of inline code. --p _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list