> GTK 2 is probably better in this respect, because it does not rely on > Xlib's i18n, it has its own code. However you'll need "libiconv" on > such systems.
I see. So on such systems, libiconv is another required dependency to be able to build Gtk+. By the way, is the correct order to build/install libiconv, then to configure glib with --with-libiconv ? Is that enough or is --with-libiconv (or equivalent) required on other steps ? Arno _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list