Guido Draheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>there are 36 more items on my list *grin*
> >>
> >>I'll feed them one at a time, so that people are not
> >>scared off and unwilling to discuss the things since
> >>they have better things to do than sit over a code
> >>review... giving it a few minutes a day is much more
> >>appropriate ;-)
> > 36... wow. please do file them in bugzilla instead/as well
> > as sending them to gtk-devel-list. It's just not manageable
> > to keep track of huge numbers of items without the sort
> > of database features that bugzilla provides.
> >
>
> I'll try to get them into shape one at a time - it's also
> quite time-consuming for me - and some are dubious whether
> they should be "acted" upon or whether it would just need
> to be documented - especially there are a lot of API calls
> which will happily segfault in some corner conditions or
> mourne about null-arguments where it would have been okay
> to keep silent - the list is quite diverse in that respect
> and I am not that sure I can express the things right to
> the point.
I wouldn't worry much about deciding whether something
is a doc bug or an implementation bug. If they don't
match, file a bug, and we'll sort it out.
Regards,
Owen
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
