--- Gian Mario Tagliaretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/1/6, Sergei Steshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > So, should everyone distrust the claim that there are no memory leaks in > > 2.8.20 ? > > You don't want to understand the meaning on the sentence in the FAQ, > where is the point in going on with this rant? Behdad and David have > already explained the situation, are you trolling? > > What EXACTLY are you trying to achieve? >
I want to see the TRUTH in FAQ. The thruth being: 1) known presence or absence of memory leaks in gtk+2.8.20; 2) known presence or absence of memory leaks in gtk+2.10.*. The words "known presence or absence" mean when the last memory leak was reported and confirmed and when it was fixed. Regarding the leaks in gtk+2.10.* the answer came in the announcement of gtk+2.10.7, i.e. the last know leak was in gtk+2.10.6. Since distros typically do NOT update packages until next release cycle, for the majority of gtk+ users in recent Linux distros the leaks are still there. And I believe the users have the right to know this from the GTK official webpage, not from this Email thread. --Sergei. --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
