>________________________________
> From: Paul Davis <p...@linuxaudiosystems.com>
>To: Sergei Steshenko <sergst...@yahoo.com>
>Cc: John Lindgren <john.lindg...@aol.com>; "gtk-list@gnome.org"
><gtk-list@gnome.org>
>Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:59 AM
>Subject: Re: Hello, some of us still care about memory usage
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Sergei Steshenko <sergst...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Is then switching to Qt a viable/practical alternative ?
>>
>
> this list is not an appropriate forum to discuss the relative merits of both
> toolkits.
>
>
>
Why ?
Aren't gtk+ developers the most appropriate persons to explain in what gtk+ is
better ?
...
The OP has a problem with gtk+ support on Windows; AFAIR Qt was meant to be
cross-platform; from your reply it's clear there are not enough resources among
gtk+ developers to support the Windows port, so, taking all this into
consideration, I think my question is quite practical and in order.
Regards,
Sergei.
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
