-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew D Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> I'm developing an application to be distributed in binary form that links
Matthew> statically to GTK+ so I won't have to worry about what version the client
Matthew> is running (of course at the expense of binary size).
I'd advise you to first read the license terms of GTK+. That is, the
GNU LGPL (in the file COPYING in the source distribution).
>From what you say, I have the *very* strong feeling that you
didn't... if you had done so, you wouldn't think about distributing a
binary application "that links statically to GTK+". As that would
violate the GTK+ license terms (said GNU LGPL).
Again: what you plan to to would violate GTK+'s license terms.
Don't do that.
Bye, J
PS: IANAL... and neither am I one of the multiple copyright holders in
the GTK+. But I *have* read the LGPL...
PPS: Strange that no-one seems to have caught this on the list.
- --
J�rgen A. Erhard eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: (GERMANY) 0721 27326
My WebHome: http://Juergen_Erhard.tripod.com
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book;
inside of a dog, it's very dark." -- Groucho Marx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use Mailcrypt and GnuPG <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iEUEARECAAYFAjhfT5YACgkQN0B+CS56qs3dTQCY03IwZpfwWuY8uN0e2PYOYVlj
ngCgiBDYnlBTrPFUAaMjj10tBDN/Sek=
=iMRC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
