I find the following message about a Qt-compatible wrapper on top of gtk. This may be of interest so I forward it here... Forwarded message: > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 3 19:57 PST 2000 > Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 22:51:51 -0500 (EST) > From: Brian Bruns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [freeqt] Intros and question > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Precedence: bulk > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-info: To unsubscribe send: 'unsubscribe freeqt [<your-email-address>]' to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Length: 1107 > > Hi everyone, > > The list seems pretty dead, but I'll ask anyway in the hopes that someone > is still working on this thing. > > I had the apparently brain-damaged idea of writing a Qt compatible set of > wrapper classes for gtk+, which I am calling QtK. It runs the first 4 > tutorial examples currently, but not much else. I'm getting ready to see > if I can't make it work for a small program (SybSQL - a sybase query tool) > written in Qt. So my question is this, I'd like to attempt to share code > between Harmony and QtK where possible (or more to the point use your fine > work on classes such as QString, QDir, and other non-visual classes and > hopefully return any improvements I make back to the project). > > Any ideas on how this might be accomplished without unnecessarily forking > the code? I'm still using the qt moc compiler, but would be more than > happy to switch over to using magna and any else that might be necessary. > > Thanks, > > Brian Bruns > The FreeTDS Project (http://www.freetds.org) > > P.S. I realize there is a whole host of reasons why this is a stupid idea, > but I'm doing it mainly for hack value. > > > -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
