> On Apr 5, 2021, at 8:21 PM, Philip Chimento <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 6:13 PM John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote:
> I tried upgrading gtk-osx-javascript, but building current spidermonkey
> requires autoconf-2.13. There's no doubt a way to get it installed but it's
> not something I care enough about to spend a day on, so if anyone wants gcj
> updated, do a merge request.
>
> IIRC, if you build spidermonkey from the tarball, you don't actually need
> autoconf-2.13, although frustratingly it does check for it only to
> subsequently not use it. You can get around this by setting the environment
> variable AUTOCONF=autoconf.
Thanks, that works. There were other issues so I wound up wasting a day on it
after all, only to get this when I tried to build gjs-1.68.0
../../src/gjs-1.68.0/gjs/coverage.cpp:22:10: fatal error:
'js/experimental/CodeCoverage.h' file not found
#include <js/experimental/CodeCoverage.h> // for EnableCodeCoverage
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is no such file in Firefox 78. There's a js/vm/CodeCoverage.h in source,
but it isn't installed; to even build code coverage in spidermonkey you have to
--enable-code-coverage, but that didn't work because the linker couldn't find
the _llvm_lcov_* symbols.
I can push what I've got so far and you can finish up getting it to work.
On the other hand is there really a compelling case for building gjs on macs?
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gtk-osx-users-list mailing list
gtk-osx-users-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-osx-users-list
