El dt 03 de 06 del 2008 a les 21:05 +0200, en/na Christian Hoff va escriure: > Hi guys, > > I'm really frustrated about Gtk#. By now I have found 4 > bugs(TreeModelFilter.ModifyFunc, broken SetValue methods, GType of > *Adapter classes wrong, virtual methods ignored by object genratable) > just by development. I have created patches for two of these and need > further info to create one for the "GType of the *Adapter classes" bug. > One patch has already made it to SVN, the other one is for a bug that > hasn't even been assigned since more than 1 week and until now I haven't > gotten the info I need to create the third patch.
Sorry, but there is no guaranteed time of response in open source projects. 1 week is a reasonable amount of time for pinging the maintainer(s) about a patch review, but not for accusing the community of lack of involvement. Get used to it. > > I have also created a new feature for Gtk#(GObject property > registration) and sent a patch to the mailing list 8 days ago; I didn't > get any feedback on it. > > That all costed me hell of a lot time (about eight hours for two weeks > just for Gtk#) to create bug reports and the new feature. I don't blame > you that I had to do so; this is free software that lives from its > community(and the generous support of Novell). But by ignoring the > patches you are implicitly telling me that my work(and community efforts > in general) are not appreciated. > > I did already write 3 posts to the mailing list and didn't get a reply; > please prove that you can do better by commenting on this post and > telling me what will happen to the GObject patch ;-) > _______________________________________________ > Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list _______________________________________________ Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
