Hi, Just adding my two cents here,
> I disagree that this would be a major problem; most of the users I > interact with are aware that software labeled as "gnome" does not > require one to use the whole gnome ball of wax. Even the gtk mailing > list archives and bugtracker are hosted on gnome.org. > > Moreso, by having it be a Gnome module, it might increase the widespread > adoption of the extension. I agree with Eric that Gnome integration would be much better than no integration at all. Also, historically many of the now standard GTK+ widgets started their life as GNOME GTK+ extensions. For a recent example see: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-migrating-GtkIconView.html So 'Gnome widget' does not necessarily mean 'GTK+ widget depending on the Gnome libraries', even less so when the developers of the widget are aware of the issue. cheers Stephane _______________________________________________ gtkglext-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkglext-list
