On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 23:28 +0200, Thomas Metz wrote: > > What would the patch look like? Is this simply a new class, or does it > > change existing API? > Just a new class. the goal is not to change the existing API. > At the moment it is not really a patch, just an independant class. > > > If it's just a new class, I don't understand why it needs to be in > > glibmm. > Because, when I searched this feature, I expected to find it in glibmm (just > a > personnal feeling). > But OK, if you think that such mechanism is useless to be provided by glibmm, > you have (obviously) a better idea than me of what glibmm shall be.
Yes, glibmm is not a bundle. It's meant to be a wrapper for glib. You should really start a google code or sourceforge project for your new API. > > If it changes existing API then it can't be allowed. > This is a good rule ! -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
