Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 00:58 -0500, José Alburquerque wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of changing the "_CLASS_OPAQUE_REFCOUNTED(Message,
>> GstMessage, NONE, gst_message_ref, gst_message_unref)" line in
>> message.hg to something like "_CLASS_GOBJECT(Message, GstMessage,
>> GST_MESSAGE, Gst::MiniObject, GstMiniObject)". Is this a good
>> approach?
>>
>
> GstMiniObject doesn't derived from GObject, right? So I don't think it
> would be a good idea to use _CLASS_GOBJECT().
>
> I'm afraid that we might need a new macro, but you might try using
> _CLASS_GENERIC() to see how far that gets us.
>
> I will take care of this if it does turn out to be difficult.
>
>
I was thinking of writing similar "wrapping" functionality for
Gst::MiniObject as in Glib::ObjectBase/Glib::Object. I thought of
taking wrap.{h,c} from glibmm and "modifying" them to work for
Gst::MiniObject/GstMiniObject and then modifying Gst::MiniObject to
include the "wrapper" functionality of Glib::ObjectBase and
Glib::Object. I'm wondering if this would be worthwhile at this time.
Would it be?
-Jose
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
