Murray Cumming wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:09 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > >> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 13:14 -0500, José Alburquerque wrote: >> >>> Okay. Here's the patch. To produce the problem simply run >>> tests/test-caps. The way it's in svn now, test/test-caps works fine, >>> but with this patch I get warnings. >>> >> Now I understand. It's this strange thing in gstreamer that stops you >> from changing items that have been referenced: >> >> (lt-test-caps:19844): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_structure_set_value: >> assertion `IS_MUTABLE (structure)' failed >> >> I really don't know what to do about them yet. It's an abuse of the >> reference-counting system. >> > > I guess we need some way to return a RefPtr without referencing the C > object, that would stop the original RefPtr from unreferencing its C > object. But I can't imagine how to do that without adding a bool member > variable to RefPtr. > > > You know, I was sort of thinking that if in the Gst::Caps::set_simple() method an unreference is done at the beginning (if refcount > 1) and then a reference back at the end, this might work.
-Jose _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
