Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."
gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.
A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the
bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.
Today's Topics:
1. [Bug 544135] [PATCH] Include depreated flags in
gtkmmconfig.in (backport from trunk) (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
2. [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper implementation
(glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
3. [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper implementation
(glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
4. [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper implementation
(glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
5. [Bug 423990] glibmm et al don't recognize new GNU m4
(glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
6. [Bug 423990] glibmm et al don't recognize new GNU m4
(glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
7. [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper implementation
(glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
8. [Bug 423990] glibmm et al don't recognize new GNU m4
(glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:05:58 +0000 (UTC)
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 544135] [PATCH] Include depreated flags
in gtkmmconfig.in (backport from trunk)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544135
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.10.x
------- Comment #1 from Johannes Schmid 2008-07-22 10:05 UTC -------
Created an attachment (id=114993)
--> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=114993&action=view)
Patch to backport the change
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544135.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:32:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper
implementation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778
glibmm | general | Ver: 2.15.x
------- Comment #12 from Szilard Pfeiffer 2008-07-22 21:32 UTC -------
Created an attachment (id=115050)
--> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=115050&action=view)
suggested changes to the wrapper
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:46:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper
implementation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778
glibmm | general | Ver: 2.15.x
Szilard Pfeiffer changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------- Comment #13 from Szilard Pfeiffer 2008-07-22 21:46 UTC -------
I would like to suggest some changes in the implementation of the wrapper
(comment 12). I can see the following benefits:
1; Glib::Node class would be closer to the original GNode structure, so it
would be simpler
2; Foreach or traverse slots should use the tree node instead of the node's
data only
3; Data would be compared by the operator == of class T instead of pointer
comparison in case of find functions
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:17:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper
implementation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778
glibmm | general | Ver: 2.15.x
------- Comment #14 from Murray Cumming 2008-07-23 07:17 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> I would like to suggest some changes in the implementation of the wrapper
> (comment 12). I can see the following benefits:
>
> 1; Glib::Node
You mean Glib::Tree, I guess.
> class would be closer to the original GNode structure, so it
> would be simpler
> 2; Foreach or traverse slots should use the tree node instead of the node's
> data only
What would be the advantage of this?
> 3; Data would be compared by the operator == of class T instead of pointer
> comparison in case of find functions
The patch seems to have lots of unrelated changes, which makes it difficult to
review.
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778.
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:50:25 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 423990] glibmm et al don't recognize
new GNU m4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423990
glibmm | build | Ver: unspecified
------- Comment #9 from Murray Cumming 2008-07-23 07:50 UTC -------
Could you submit an actual patch, please, ideally against svn, with a ChangeLog
entry.
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423990.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:05:25 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 423990] glibmm et al don't recognize
new GNU m4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423990
glibmm | build | Ver: unspecified
------- Comment #10 from Damien Carbery 2008-07-23 09:05 UTC -------
Created an attachment (id=115083)
--> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=115083&action=view)
Use grep -i to check for GNU m4. Include ChangeLog entry.
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423990.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:51:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 520778] [PATCH] GNode wrapper
implementation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778
glibmm | general | Ver: 2.15.x
------- Comment #15 from Levi Bard 2008-07-23 12:51 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> 1; Glib::Node class would be closer to the original GNode structure, so it
> would be simpler
Are you suggesting renaming Tree to Node?
> 3; Data would be compared by the operator == of class T instead of pointer
> comparison in case of find functions
Data is already compared using the == operator.
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520778.
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:12:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: "glibmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 423990] glibmm et al don't recognize
new GNU m4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423990
glibmm | build | Ver: unspecified
------- Comment #11 from Murray Cumming 2008-07-23 13:12 UTC -------
Committed to svn trunk. Thanks.
I guess we will see if it stops working for anyone.
--
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why
you received
this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving
emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone
if you are having problems with the system.
You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423990.
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
End of Gtkmm-forge Digest, Vol 26, Issue 7
******************************************
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
