I think that it would be good if you could clarify this somewhere in the documentation. For someone comming for different bindings, that's a little bit confusing (I got your point and I agree with you. Java bindings does not expose destroy signal too) . Em Seg, 2008-11-24 às 11:55 +0100, Murray Cumming escreveu: > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 08:41 -0200, Fabio Rafael da Rosa wrote: > > Got it. So, gtkmm does not expose the destroy signal , right. > > Right. > > > I used to use destroy signal for handling close events, > > That's common in C, but it's not a good idea. You should handle > delete_event by handling delete_event. > > > and started > > learning gtkmm some days ago. Hide or delete_event can do de job, so, > > thanks, I asked because I was curious. Is there a reason for not > > exposing it > > It leads to confusion and bad program design. By not allowing you to use > it we have helped you to avoid that. >
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
