As I said before, I've used NetBeans for a long time. Especially for me, I found some disadvantages. They are: - much memory consumption than Eclipse and C::B - much processor time consumption while building or auto-completion - it parses projects for a long time - it doesn't handle autotools well (6.5): I've tried to use with a non-automated makefile (the wizard asked some questions about autotools: configure, makefile path etc). But later, when I wanted to rebuild the project it doesn't launch autoreconf with the old arguments. They are --prefix, needed for debugging.
But, it has good advantages - good, and probably the best auto-completion I've ever seen (it parses even preprocessor definitions heavily used in GTK+ (even private section)) - good-looking and code formatting. - it can build packages, but I don't use them :-P Yes, I like it to use even in C++ environment, but my computer (2.8 GHz HT + 1.5 Gb RAM) works slowly with all the disadvantages above :( I also can suggest Anjuta, because of it's autotools integration, but I don't like their GUI and some debugging things, so it's easier to learn Autotools by yourself and use other IDEs (such as C::B) 2009/5/7 Damon Register <[email protected]>: > Fabri'cio Godoy wrote: >> NetBeans is my choise. Between Anjuta, Code::Blocks and Eclipse the >> NetBeans has much better autocompletion, code error detection etc. > This creates an interesting question for me. I have recently seen > several discussions on development environment and it seems that > NetBeans is a popular one. A while ago I thought Eclipse was popular > but I don't see it much in discussions now. Has NetBeans moved ahead of > Eclipse in popularity? Does anyone here use Eclipse? Any opinions? > > Damon Register > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
