On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 21:47 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 13:57 +0200, Krzesimir Nowak wrote: > > Hi. > > > > Recently Murray told me that at some point he will convert `unsigned > > int' to `guint' [1]. I wonder what is the purpose for this. Something is > > wrong with 2 words type? > > Yeah, I prefer guint. But it's just a preference. But even if you > disagree, which is easy, it's now the convention in gtkmm: > http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/gtkmm-2.4/docs/tutorial/html/sec-wrapping-hg-files.html#gmmproc-basic-types >
I visited that link today to see what is an C++ equivalent of guint - I was certain it was unsigned int. Seems I was wrong. :) And I don't disagree - I don't mind if convention is guint or unsigned int. Just curious. So, if this is a convention I could look for any unsigned ints in public API and make a patch - I have some free time now. Krzesimir Nowak _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
