I would not dismiss such a question just out of hand, see e.g.: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483790
2009/8/2 Allen <[email protected]> > Hello Tomasz Jankowski, > > I guess Mark Roberts is confirming with you that Gtk::Mutex does NOT > provide virutal destructor. > > P > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Why Gtk::Mutex doesn't provide virtual destructor? >>> >> >> Why should it? >> >> Mark >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> Mark Roberts, hardcore C++-Programmierer, Musiker, Schauspieler >> 05121 511455 >> www.rapid-arts-movement.de >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gtkmm-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > > -- Please note that according to the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months. [Bitte beachten Sie, dass dem Gesetz zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung zufolge jeder elektronische Kontakt mit mir sechs Monate lang gespeichert wird.]
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
