Am Montag, den 03.08.2009, 17:34 +0200 schrieb Murray Cumming: > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 16:41 +0200, Daniel Elstner wrote: > > Phew. Sorry everyone for boring you to death. Now it is up to module > > maintainers to give us the go-ahead for breaking everything. (The > > idea > > is to convert only the master branches for now, and then we will see.) > > I maintain or part-maintain most of them (apart from geglmm). I guess > fine with me.
Cool, thanks. I primarily want every developer of a module to know what is hitting him, as sort of an excuse for this unilateral act of build system intervention. > But I would hope that you could test this system first on just a subset, > such as glibmm, pangomm, gtkmm, libgdamm, goocanvasmm. What's the > downside of doing that? That's what we will do, because we will start at the lowest level (that is, libsigc++, glibmm and probably cairomm) and then move upward through the stack. We could have an official break in between and a request for comments session on the list. --Daniel _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
