On 2015.04.11. 10:46, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
>
>
> Den 2015-04-10 15:09, Andrejs Hanins skrev:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2015.04.09. 14:01, Andrejs Hanins wrote:
>>> Hi Kjell,
>>>
>>> On 2015.04.08. 18:08, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
>>>> A reply, at long last! I have filed bug
>>>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747508 with a patch that I
>>>> think fixes your problem.
>>>>
>>>> It would be fine if you could test the patch with your quite complicated
>>>> type of Variant. Can you apply and test a patch without great trouble?
>>> Thanks for the patch, I'll try it later and will let you know about the
>>> results.
>>>
>>>> If not, I can send you updated versions of the glibmm/variant.h and
>>>> variant.cc files.
>>> No need, thanks, patch is enough for me.
>> I have applied the patch to hg and ccg files, but it does not cause real .h
>> and .cc files to be regenerated by gmmproc. I even tried to delete the
>> source files, but still no luck. There seems to be no automatic make rule
>> for regeneration (bug?). Unfortunately, I failed to understand how to
>> regenerate the source files in reasonable amount of time.
>>
>> Can you please help me how to regenerate the files under glib/glibmm or send
>> regenerated variant.h/.cc files as you initially offered?
>>
>>
> You must run ./configure with the --enable-maintainer-mode option.
So easy, shame to me :) Ok, I can confirm that your patch definitely solves my
case. I can now parse a{oa{sa{sv}}} signature by using Glib::ustring as a
template parameter of Glib::Variant for the 'o'. Thank you Kjell! I suppose,
this patch will be included in next Glibmm version 2.45 ?
I have also updated the Bugzilla ticket.
>
>
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
