On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 18:57 +0100, Chris Vine wrote: > I don't disagree with the rest of your post, but this is wrong. Using > the gcc-5.1 ABI does not require you to compile C++ code with the > -std=c++11 flag,
Ah, thanks. > and there is no proposal that fedora should do so. > From that point of view the _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI define is a slight > misnomer - the point is that the ABI is compliant with C++11, not that > it is only for C++11. [snip] But the applications do need to be rebuilt in Fedora? So there is an ABI break? And that rebuild just has to be done with the newer compiler version? -- Murray Cumming [email protected] www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
