So, I've read most of this conversation, and it seems this simple
alternative hasn't come up yet:
// Old code
auto button = Gtk::manage(new Gtk::Button("a button");
button->show();
container.add(button);
// New code
auto button = container.add_managed<Gtk::Button>("a button");
button->show();
I don't know how feasible it is to create loads of new member functions
with a _managed (or a different) suffix, but API-wise I think reducing
the creation and insertion into the container to one statement would
make sense with std::unique_ptr.
Am 05.02.2016 um 14:47 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> The trend in modern C++ is to use std::unique_ptr<> by default to
> express ownership, usually via std::make_unique() (in C++14), insead of
> using a raw pointer via a "naked new".
>
> So, unless you know something else is necessary, this would be good:
> auto thing = std::make_unique<Thing>();
> instead of this:
> auto thing = new Thing();
> or
> Thing* thing = new Thing();
>
>
> It's also considered wise to receive a std::unique_ptr as a parameter
> if the method really plans to take ownership. For instance:
> void Foo::take_thing(std::shared_ptr<Thing> thing);
>
>
> So I was wondering if we could use this idea instead of Gtk::manage(),
> which has much the same sense of "take ownership", and eventually
> deprecate Gtk::manage().
>
> Then we could do this, for instance:
> auto button = std::make_unique<Gtk::Button>("a button");
> button->show();
> container.add(std::move(button));
> instead of this:
> auto button = Gtk::manage(new Gtk::Button>("a button"));
> button->show();
> container.add(*button);
>
> This would work too, I think:
> container.add(std::make_unique<Gtk::Button>("a button"));
>
>
> Then we would be using standard C++ syntax/API instead of custom gtkmm
> API.
>
>
> However, it would need us to add overloads for methods that currently
> take Widget& parameters. But I think that's doable. For instance:
>
> void Container::add(std::unique_ptr<Widget> widget)
> {
> add(*(Gtk::manage(widget.release())));
> }
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
