Actually, I don't see a real need for it, so I don't have a good reason
to require C++14 (instead of C++11) just yet.

Murray

On Mo, 2016-08-01 at 21:04 +0000, Christoph Brill wrote:
> Hi Murray,
> 
> I'm all for latest C++ changes. g++ supports it, clang supports it.
> That's all compilers relevant to me.
> 
> Best wishes,
>  Christoph
> 
> Murray Cumming <[email protected]> schrieb am Do., 7. Juli 2016 um
> 12:19 Uhr:
> > Our current stable versions require C++11. Does anybody object to
> > us
> > requiring C++14 for the current unstable versions, which will
> > become
> > the next stable versions? GCC 6 uses C++14 by default.
> > 
> > We don't need C++14 for anything urgently but it would be nice to
> > have
> > some little things such as decltype(auto) and std::make_unique().
> > 
> > --
> > Murray Cumming
> > [email protected]
> > www.murrayc.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtkmm-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
-- 
Murray Cumming
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com



_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
  • C++14 Murray Cumming
    • Re: C++14 Christoph Brill
      • Re: C++14 Murray Cumming

Reply via email to