> The poster is confusing sigc::mem_fun() with std::mem_fun(). How do you know? Everything seems like a delberate reference to the sigc:: template so far, just missing the availability of the other overload.
For posterity, I'll point out that the sigc:: one can't always be replaced by some other alternative, since it uses sigc::trackable to auto-disconnect the handler if the object is a trackable and goes out of scope.
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
