This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF61CF.B03976C6
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
One time I saw one of those review charts in a cycle mag, you know the ones
with all the bikes, test dates, and important performance figures.
It listed the 93 GTS as 148 mph on radar. Now, if you figure that Yamaha
only lets them test a creampuff, perfect example of a GTS that was gone over
with a microscope for problems, then this probably added 2-3 mph over what
we would see.
I have seen an indicated 155, which I figure is the low 140's at best.
Stock tires and driveline, no bags, and seriously tucked in.
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF61CF.B03976C6
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: GTS Top Speed?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>One time I saw one of those review charts in a cycle =
mag, you know the ones with all the bikes, test dates, and important =
performance figures.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>It listed the 93 GTS as 148 mph on radar. Now, =
if you figure that Yamaha only lets them test a creampuff, perfect =
example of a GTS that was gone over with a microscope for problems, =
then this probably added 2-3 mph over what we would see.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I have seen an indicated 155, which I figure is the =
low 140's at best. Stock tires and driveline, no bags, and =
seriously tucked in.</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01BF61CF.B03976C6--
