This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C01844.B3036BC4
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I actualy built one of these about 15 years ago. Funny thing about it, the
thing worked !! However, the parts were very hard to find, and very
expensive. You had the option of using either one or two transmitters, and
my version only worked on X and K band. I just used one transmitter, and
the total cost of parts was way over $500, plus the thing wound up far
bigger than planned. It was impractical to use in a normal car. If it
could have been weatherized, it might have worked in a tractor trailer with
two transmitters.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 4:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Radar Dectector/Jammer
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of the car magazines tested these a few years ago. The detector
worked,
> but the jammer did nothing.
Which could be a good thing. As I understand it, a jammer is a form of
radio, and while we can receive radio without a license (radar detector)
once we cross the line into jamming it we have lots of Federal agencies
very unhappy with us.
My favorite was a many years ago, sold as "plans" only for legal reasons,
of a "hypothetical" device that would switch (at your option) between
sending back radar signals at a set reading (say, 54 mph), or as some
percentage of what is really happening (54%, so at 100 would be 54 mph).
Cool idea.
Phil
------_=_NextPart_001_01C01844.B3036BC4
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: Radar Dectector/Jammer</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>I actualy built one of these about 15 years =
ago. Funny thing about it, the thing worked !! However, the =
parts were very hard to find, and very expensive. You had the =
option of using either one or two transmitters, and my version only =
worked on X and K band. I just used one transmitter, and the =
total cost of parts was way over $500, plus the thing wound up far =
bigger than planned. It was impractical to use in a normal =
car. If it could have been weatherized, it might have worked in a =
tractor trailer with two transmitters. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 4:35 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: Multiple recipients of list</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: Re: Radar Dectector/Jammer</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>On Wed, 6 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>> One of the car magazines tested these a few =
years ago. The detector worked, </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>> but the jammer did nothing.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Which could be a good thing. As I understand =
it, a jammer is a form of</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>radio, and while we can receive radio without a =
license (radar detector)</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>once we cross the line into jamming it we have lots =
of Federal agencies</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>very unhappy with us.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>My favorite was a many years ago, sold as =
"plans" only for legal reasons,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>of a "hypothetical" device that would =
switch (at your option) between</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>sending back radar signals at a set reading (say, 54 =
mph), or as some</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>percentage of what is really happening (54%, so at =
100 would be 54 mph).</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cool idea.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Phil</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C01844.B3036BC4--
