Hi,

I am hesitant to abandon the CC theme altogether. But maybe, we could
dedicate one of the two rooms to old films in the public domain and the
second one to current CC movies? Does this sound okay with you guys?

Some really beautiful silent movies have become public domain such as
Nosferatu and Metropolis.

---
Florian Nadge, GUADEC 2013
GUADEC c/o Red Hat| Purkynova 71/99| 61200 Brno| tel: +420 603 764 858

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David King <amigad...@amigadave.com> wrote:

> Hi!
>
>
> On 2013-07-09 13:07, Marcel Kolaja <marcel.kol...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Public domain is fine too. However, I'm a bit surprised that the linked
>> movies fit into this category, as the copy monopoly lasts for 70 years
>> after the death of all authors. Could you please elaborate on it a bit
>> more, David? Thanks!
>>
>
> Night of the Living Dead is a bit special, as the original theatrical
> release was never under copyright in the US:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Night_of_the_Living_Dead#**
> Copyright_status<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Living_Dead#Copyright_status>
>
> House on Haunted Hill was published before 1964 and did not have its
> copyright renewed, so the old term of 28 years from publishing of the work
> would have applied:
>
> https://archive.org/post/**422355/easy-copyright-**
> question-for-house-on-haunted-**hill<https://archive.org/post/422355/easy-copyright-question-for-house-on-haunted-hill>
>
> It is important to find the original theatrical print, which I linked to,
> which has orchestral theme music without lyrics, as the version with lyrics
> had its copyright renewed and so is not in the public domain.
>
> D.O.A. is in a similar situation regarding not renewing the copyright (or
> rather, renewing it too late and the copyright office finding the renewal
> invalid):
>
> http://chart.copyrightdata.**com/ch17.html<http://chart.copyrightdata.com/ch17.html>
>
> It is easier to search for works published in the US before 1923, as those
> are all in the public domain, but there are many works (such as those
> above) that are outside of the usual life-plus-70 years term.
>
> --
> http://amigadave.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> guadec-list mailing list
> guadec-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
guadec-list mailing list
guadec-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list

Reply via email to