Maybe it's better if Ismael proposed 3 options where he's available
and we pick from one of those?

On 1 May 2018 at 03:55, Nuritzi Sanchez <nurit...@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Sorry for the late reply on the poll outcome for meetings. Only Ruben
> answered the poll, so it wasn't very effective anyway. From the poll it
> looks like Thursday at 14:00 or 19:00 UTC might work.
>
> In case the local organizers pick a time that doesn't work for me, I
> understand. The most important thing is for the local team to be able to
> meet regularly and make progress. Perhaps I can try to join on certain
> meetings that are most relevant to what I might help with, or else we can
> have special meetings for that.
>
>
>
>
> .............................................................................
>
> Nuritzi Sanchez  |  +1.650.218.7388 |  Endless
>
> 2018-04-29 13:38 GMT-05:00 Benjamin Berg <benja...@sipsolutions.net>:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 14:20 +0200, Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
>> > For me, schedule option are not the best perhaps I selected some hours,
>> > it's no possible to add other schedule options like morning or nights
>> > (central europe time)?
>>
>> Could you suggest good times for you and maybe other people from the
>> local organisers? That might be more productive than one of us either
>> guessing or creating a huge framadate poll.
>>
>> Note that mornings will exclude anyone in the US (probably primarily
>> Nuritzi at this point), so that makes those times less preferable.
>>
>> Benjamin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> guadec-list mailing list
> guadec-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list
>
_______________________________________________
guadec-list mailing list
guadec-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list

Reply via email to