h1 a:hover {background-color:#888;color:#fff ! important;}
div#emailbody table#itemcontentlist tr td div ul {
list-style-type:square; padding-left:1em; } div#emailbody
table#itemcontentlist tr td div blockquote { padding-left:6px;
border-left: 6px solid #dadada; margin-left:1em; } div#emailbody
table#itemcontentlist tr td div li { margin-bottom:1em;
margin-left:1em; } table#itemcontentlist tr td a:link,
table#itemcontentlist tr td a:visited, table#itemcontentlist tr td
a:active, ul#summarylist li a { color:#000033; font-weight:bold;
text-decoration:none; } img {border:none;} The Sport Review: “Federer
and Djokovic headline Shanghai Masters semi-finals” plus 1 more

Federer and Djokovic headline Shanghai Masters semi-finals

Posted: 15 Oct 2010 05:11 PM PDT


The headlining semi-final of the Shanghai Masters will be—with
apologies to Andy Murray—the match between long-term rivals, numbers
two and three in the world, Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic.
Indeed, since Rafael Nadal's exit in the third round killed, once
again, the hoped-for match-up between him and Federer, this semi-final
has been the most talked about contest in Shanghai.

The prospect is truly mouth-watering, for they will be meeting for an
extraordinary 17th time, though Djokovic is still only 23 years old.
What's more, the Serb has more than held his own, with honours even
since Djokovic won their semi-final clash at the Australian Open in
2008.

What gives their latest meeting some extra spice is that Djokovic beat
Federer in a five-set thriller in the semi-finals of the US Open last
month – his first victory over his rival in four consecutive meetings
in New York.

That match followed hard on the heels of another no-holds-barred
contest just three weeks before in the Toronto Masters: that one went
to Federer.

There's also the small question of ranking at stake. Djokovic has owned
the No2 slot since his win in New York, but Federer will take it back
again after Shanghai. That's how close these two men are.

The style of their progress has only served to pour more oil on the
fire. Djokovic made quicksilver speed to the quarter-finals for the
loss of just eight games, so he was expected to make light work of the
unseeded Guillermo Garcia-Lopez.

The Spaniard had won 10 of his last 11 matches, captured the Bangkok
title, and risen to a career-high of No35, but it took Djokovic just 77
minutes to beat him 6-2 6-3.

Djokovic, too, played well within himself, averaged over 70 per cent on
his first serve, and defended with speed and flexibility. It is hard to
find a weakness in the Serb's game at the moment, and with his
rediscovered confidence and apparent super-fitness, he is proving to be
worth his ranking.

If Djokovic was hot favourite to win his quarter-final, the odds were
less short for Federer over the big Swede, Robin Soderling. The two had
played 14 times, with Federer dominating 13-1. However, they had shared
the spoils in their last two matches, with Soderling breaking through
in the quarter-finals of Roland Garros to end Federer's record-breaking
23 consecutive Slam semi-finals.

Neither man dropped a set on his way to what promised to be a big
showdown. Soderling in particular likes the hard courts and temperate
conditions that Shanghai offers. So Federer was as surprised as anyone
to wipe the floor with the Swede in just 54 minutes, 6-1 6-1: "He
didn't have one of his best days."

It was, in fact, an error-strewn game on both sides, but the Swede
constantly missed the lines by inches, and served at just 53 per cent.
With his potent weapon missing, it was open season for Federer, who was
guilty of numerous errors of his own, though that can be put down to
the lack of rhythm he could generate from Soderling's wayward play.

Soderling will have to wait until his next match to find the points to
qualify for the World Tour Finals, but that is a matter of when not if.
Federer, meanwhile, can enjoy his evening's Mandarin classes basking in
the satisfaction of his 220th Masters match win, a record he took from
Andre Agassi in Cincinnati.

So yes, it is the two best men in the lower half of the draw who will
take to the court for the second semi-final, and it will be a
humdinger—impossible to call.

But ahead lies the almost certain prospect of Murray. Though his will
not be the headline match on semi-final Saturday, that is no reflection
on the tennis Murray has played in Shanghai. He cruised past
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga in a mere 55 minutes without facing a break point.
It is, rather, a reflection on the unexpected opponent that he faces.

World No41 Juan Monaco won the most hotly contested of the semi-finals
against the man who beat Nadal, Austrian Jurgen Melzer. Despite the
contrast in their rankings, the Argentine held the 4-1 advantage in
matches over Melzer, and it took him almost three hours of tough tennis
to take that tally to 5-1.

Monaco has never reached a Masters semi-final before, and he now has a
lot of tennis in his legs, including three tie-breakers. If Murray
maintains his form, he should make straightforward progress to the
final.

And by Sunday, Murray may also feel the benefit of being first on court
on Saturday. He's barely broken sweat so far, will have a good four
hours longer to recover from his semi, and will most likely face a man
who has been pushed to the limits.

So the omens for Murray are looking very good indeed. He faces the very
real prospect of taking his second Masters title of the autumn.

Henry ‘proud and humbled’ by NESV Liverpool takeover

Posted: 15 Oct 2010 09:08 AM PDT


New England Sports Ventures are the new owners of Liverpool Football
Club.
With the Royal Bank of Scotland deadline for the sale of the club
looming, NESV and the Liverpool board finalised a deal which will see
the Boston-based company take charge at Anfield.

Former owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett have voiced their
disappointment over the sale and the way in which it was conducted,
with the American duo planning to sue RBS and the independent members
of the Liverpool board for damages worth $1.6billion.

Hicks had tried to sell his shares in the club to Mill Financial
earlier on Friday, but the American hedge fund failed in its attempts
to take control at Anfield as the Premier League would not offer it the
opportunity to take the relevant tests in order to be allowed to own a
club in England's top flight.

Now NESV have full control over affairs at Liverpool, with Hicks and
Gillett no longer having anything to do with England's most decorated
football team.

NESV principal owner John Henry said: “On behalf of the entire NESV
partnership, I want to express how incredibly proud and humbled we are
to be confirmed as the new owners of Liverpool FC.

“We regard our role as that of stewards for the Club with a primary
focus on returning the Club to greatness on and off the field for the
long-term. We are committed first and foremost to winning.

“We have a history of winning, and today we want LFC supporters to know
that this approach is what we intend to bring to this great Club.”

Liverpool chairman Martin Broughton added: “I am delighted that we have
been able to successfully conclude the sale process which has been
thorough and extensive.

“The Board decided to accept NESV’s offer on the basis that it best met
the criteria we set out originally for a new owner. NESV is buying
Liverpool in order to put it on an excellent financial footing and
continue to develop it internationally.

“This is a good deal which comprehensively resolves the pressing issue
of the Club’s debt and should give staff, players and fans great
confidence regarding the future of Liverpool FC.”
You are subscribed to email updates from The Sport Review
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email delivery
powered by Google Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

--
Posted By Mas Item Arekjowo to The Sport Review at 10/16/2010 12:02:00
AM

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Gugukluhayat" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gugukluhayat?hl=en.

Cevap