Hello, Eli Eli Marmor said: > > If I had to recommend anything I would recomend to edit files by hand, > > since > > :-) Well, it is exactly what I recommended to this customer... > But he thought it to be insufficient... > > All of us don't need GUI. But in order to dominate the dumb users, > Intranets of corporations, etc., we must give them a good GUI. > Contrary to 52% dominance of Apache among Internets (according to > http://www.netcraft.com), only 8% of the Intranets are Apache > (according to Zona Research). And the GUI must support Apache 1.3, > since many of these users want to run Apache on NT (sorry, but > this is the case...).
Comanche supports 1.3 Also, I discovered (www.fresheat.net) that Webmin has now (2/5/98) an Apache module for its HTML configuration interface that seems also quite complete. I have given it a try and looks good. It is written in perl. Maybe it could be suitable for your client. > > Please mail me with coments about what can be improved. > > Well, if I would have to report anything, it would be: Support > for Apache 1.3. And maybe an integration into the development code > of Apache Group. I think it must be an integral part of Apache. > I guess that you meant *technical* comments, rather than these > comments. But I think these comments are very important for the > future of Comanche. I agree with you. Apache should ship with a good management tool. But I also think that this tool should be complete, flexible and well documented. Current projects are still in a very early stage of development to fulfill these goals Best regards Daniel -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Lopez Ridruejo "Imagination is more important E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] than knowledge" PGP key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Albert Einstein -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
