Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Cunning, isn't it? It passes the test because a continuation captured
>>during an ecache_evalx call will preserve the values on the stack, and
>>because the values on the stack are not affected by set!s on the letrec
>>environment.
>
>
> Yep, I was thinkning in this direction as well... looks like the right
> approach.
>
>
>>What do you think? It seems like a very self-contained trick, so I
>>think we could easily copy it to Guile.
>
>
> The trick: yes; the code: probably not. Neil, do you want to do it?
>
Yes, I'll have a go.
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
