Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is it worth commenting that the use of dev+ino (as opposed to > pathname) avoids traversing hard links (notably . and ..) multiple > times, or is that too obvious?
Yep, that's noted in the manual. Personally I'd think seeing linked files multiple times in a tree walk might actually be a good thing sometimes. But I'm not going to change the design. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
