Hi!
"Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, no reason it couldn't do that -- unless you'd want it to
> automatically swap in some kind of cooperative, call/cc-based
> threading implementation in that situation. (I take it, though, that
> --without-threads means no threads of any kind, period.) I'll put
> together a patch...
Actually, `--without-threads' means "null-threads.h", so yes, no
threads. In that case, an error message is enough.
There used to be "coop-threads", but that is no longer available (I'm
removing "coop-threads.{h,defs}", which I just noticed are still in the
repo but not referenced from anywhere).
Thanks!
Ludo'.
