Ludovic Courtès escreveu: >> +#if (SCM_DEBUG_CELL_ACCESSES == 0 && SCM_SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG == 4) > > x86-64 is not the only arch with 4-byte long long integers.
I'm not pretending it is the end-all fix. - we (I) need to understand what is happening and make the numbers match up exactly. This is just a kludge. > I'm still in favor of "git revert" since the log message makes it clear > which patch was reverted and why. "We" can then take our time and work > out a proper fix, and finally re-merge the patch plus its fix. > Furthermore, in the eventuality where none of us eventually finds a fix, > `master' is left in the previous state, which is better IMO. 'master' in its previous states grows the heap to 600M doing the 1000-fold version of srfi-18 test I posted. I think it's not a good solution. Commenting out the assert for x86-64 should yield better behavior. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
