Hello, "Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, perhaps it would be nicer to put both those notes in a top > level file called "ChangeLog", rather than in HACKING. Yes, that's the most obvious place to put information about ChangeLogs. Other ChangeLogs can be renamed as you suggested. > Finally, I'm assuming that there would be no change to the quality or > style of the information that we used to put in ChangeLogs; the only > difference is that the same information will now be in the commit > message. Is that what everyone else is assuming too? Yes, that's my assumption, too, which is why I was looking for an Emacs mode to simplify the task. As far as releases are concerned, we can surely use one of these scripts to generate a top-level ChangeLog. It doesn't seem too complicated and may be handy for users who don't want to browse the Git repository. Thanks, Ludo'.
