Hi Han-Wen, On Wed 12 Nov 2008 05:41, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One angle that we could take is time based release planning, like GNOME and > Fedora do: plan to do one or two releases per year on a rigid > schedule. With GNOME there is also a difference, as you know: they do not add API in micro series, only in minor series, and never change the API or ABI in incompatible ways. While that should be our intent, it's quite a burden for a language implementation that exposes as much of its guts as Guile does. I think we should preserve Guile's ability to change API or ABI incompatibly (while providing shims: next mail). Releasing more often would be great, though. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
