Julian Graham <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi Neil,
>
>> Am I correct in thinking that you can commit this yourself? - subject
>> to Savannah coming back up, of course. If so, please do that after
>> incorporating the following points.
>
> Can I? As far as I know I haven't been granted the appropriate
> permissions, but I'll look into it.
I thought we organised that towards the end of your SRFI-18 work...
Anyway, once Savannah is alive again I'll check and `make it so' if it
isn't already the case.
>> That's not quite idiomatic English, is it? I know it's the title of
>> the SRFI, but I think that `Accessing environment variables' would be
>> simpler and better.
>
> No, I suppose it isn't. But my assumption was that for documentation
> nodes for SRFI modules, we were going with the title of the SRFI --
> and that's what SRFI-98 is called. I'll update it.
Thanks. I agree that there's an argument for keeping the original
title, but I think it's more important for us to make sure that our
manual reads well.
(Especially in the light of the next email that I'm about to write...)
Regards,
Neil
