Hello! Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
>>> * Should we establish some rules for what you get when you don't >>> specify a version? >> >> Yes! The latest available? > > I don't know. This is IMO a terrific part of version handling in R6 modules. What will it mean for a 2009 program to import `(rnrs base)' when R27RS is released? This was discussed and questioned back then: http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/2007-May/002332.html . I think such issues should lead us to have a `:version' option that does just what's needed for R6RS, and does not try to do anything smart (which could seem to be non-deterministic). We could even go as far as discouraging its use in the manual. Thanks, Ludo'.
