On Mon 19 Oct 2009 23:08, Neil Jerram <[email protected]> writes:
> Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes: > >> Oh no, I haven't seen a new one either. I was just going to take a look >> at the old one again and see how much work it needed -- because it's not >> fair to Daniel to keep his work in limbo, IMO. > > True - but I thought Mark's patch was an orthogonal optimisation, and > hence that Daniel's work shouldn't depend on it. Is that wrong? You're probably right, I'll see about getting Daniel's work in regardless. Ciao, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
