Hi, On Wed 21 Jul 2010 01:17, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> Indeed, if ‘vhash-assoc’ et al. are changed to return a vhash instead of >>> a pair >> >> Thinking more about it, I think I’d rather keep ‘vhash-assoc’ & co. as >> they are, and add ‘vhash-assoc*’ & co., which would return a vhash. > > Commit 927bf5e8cc0af9515797ebab6d9ba162bef23c2a is roughly the original > patch. Doesn't that impose an allocation penalty on vhash-assoc? A -- http://wingolog.org/
