On Thursday, September 02, 2010 05:59:59 pm Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hmm.  So IIUC, the sub-pattern ‘(<> <a> <a>.r1)’ matches anything that
> is a match according to custom matcher ‘<a>’, and binds the sub-match
> ‘r1’ of ‘<a>’ to ‘<a>.r1’, right?

Hmm maybe need to clarify
<a>.r1 is just a variable name <a> is a function. So
(<> match-fkn pattern) is the ideom here!

/Stefan

Reply via email to