Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> On Sat 29 Jan 2011 09:20, Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes:
>
>> * libguile/numbers.c (scm_div, scm_mod, scm_div_and_mod, scm_div0,
>> scm_mod0, scm_div0_and_mod0): New extensible procedures `div', `mod',
>> `div-and-mod', `div0', `mod0', `div0-and-mod0'.
>
> I wonder; should we use Taylor Campbell's names? From
> http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/DivisionRiastradh. I am inclined to
> think so. It doesn't seem to me that there is any special reason to
> take the R6RS names here.
I forgot to ask before: what names do you think we should use for div0,
mod0, and div0-and-mod0? Taylor Campbell didn't name those.
Thanks,
Mark
