On Mon 21 Mar 2011 22:50, Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> - "gel" is short; and it's the name of Guile before it was Guile; and > suggests sticking things together; and AFAIK isn't already being used > for anything else; and has similar key positions as "gdo", so is > equally easy to type. Gel is good! > - I think I might find guile-tools (as is) less bothering if its > built-in commands (help, version and list) were rewritten as scripts > themselves. Then it would be clearer that the remaining code in > guile-tools was just implementing the main-invocation convention for > scripts/*. Good idea also! > On the overall point, of having a separate name instead of just "guile", > I think it just comes down to the observation that "because the `git' > experience seems definitive". And I agree that it's hard to argue with > that. > > Best wishes for reaching a decision on this! Heh, thanks! I'm going to stir the pot a little bit now, with another suggestion for the name :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
