Hi :) On Tue 03 May 2011 14:19, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > >> smob-name->class > > Yes, why not. (It’s equivalent to (@@ (oop goops) foobar) in terms of > providing access to everyone, though.) OK. GOOPS really isn't for the ocap folks, given class-direct-subclasses, the cross-module implications of defining a new method on a generic, etc :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
