Hi, On Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:16, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> I have a branch that fixes literal matching to actually compare toplevel > bindings, as the RNRS suggest, rather than simply assuming that a > literal that is not lexically bound can be compared symbolically. In the end I think this is too disruptive for stable-2.0, for DSL-style macros with large literal lists that have relied on symbolic matching. I will apply it to master though. Perhaps in the future we will bind `else' and `=>' as well. Also we can add some kind of #:symbolic-literals option to syntax-case, if that's useful. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
