Hi! Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Right now I think you could get the same thing by running match on the > output of the peg - something like > > (match (peg:tree (peg-parse <pattern> <tree>)) > ((list-of-as) ...)). Can you give an example of what ‘peg-parse’ and ‘peg:tree’ return? Ludo’. PS: I would suggest removing the ‘peg-’ and ‘peg:’ prefixes. Users can still use a renamer if the names clash.