Hi! Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> skribis:
> Right now I think you could get the same thing by running match on the
> output of the peg - something like
>
> (match (peg:tree (peg-parse <pattern> <tree>))
> ((list-of-as) ...)).
Can you give an example of what ‘peg-parse’ and ‘peg:tree’ return?
Ludo’.
PS: I would suggest removing the ‘peg-’ and ‘peg:’ prefixes. Users can
still use a renamer if the names clash.
