On Tue 24 Jan 2012 11:30, Peter TB Brett <pe...@peter-b.co.uk> writes:
> It seems pretty clear to me that the only (debatable) downside to using > Mark's implementation is that some definitions end up in the "wrong" > module, while your implementation has several potentially *major* > problems (including the necessity of providing universally unique > gensyms) Let's be clear here: the universally-unique gensym issue is something that Guile *already* has, in version 2.0.0, 2.0.1, etc. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
