l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Looks great! I had a glance at the E17 bindings, and I see that the API > uses raw pointer objects; using “wrapped pointer types” would provide > type checking, and a nicer UI if you add printers. :-)
That's an excellent point; yes, I'll do that. Using wrapped pointer types, it should then be the case that no naked pointer values ever go in or out from the module that provides the binding - which feels like a nice property. Neil