l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Looks great!  I had a glance at the E17 bindings, and I see that the API
> uses raw pointer objects; using “wrapped pointer types” would provide
> type checking, and a nicer UI if you add printers.  :-)

That's an excellent point; yes, I'll do that.  Using wrapped pointer
types, it should then be the case that no naked pointer values ever
go in or out from the module that provides the binding - which feels
like a nice property. 

        Neil

Reply via email to