[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Looks great! I had a glance at the E17 bindings, and I see that the API > uses raw pointer objects; using “wrapped pointer types” would provide > type checking, and a nicer UI if you add printers. :-)
That's an excellent point; yes, I'll do that. Using wrapped pointer
types, it should then be the case that no naked pointer values ever
go in or out from the module that provides the binding - which feels
like a nice property.
Neil
