Hi, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Andy Wingo <[email protected]> skribis: > >> What if we merge "Guile Modules" and "Standard Library" into one >> "Standard Library" node, and keep "API Reference" as it is? > > Sounds good to me. Perhaps “Standard Library” could have sub-sections, > like “Data Structures”, “Web”, “XML”, “Texinfo”, etc.
Yes, that sounds good to me too. However, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> wrote: > For me the difference is that nodes of "API reference" describe > functionality that is often not segregated in modules, whereas "Guile > Modules" has nodes that describe modules. this distinction makes sense to me, but is not actually what is in place. For example, "LALR parsing", "Line Oriented and Delimited Text", "Block reading and writing", and "Local evaluation". How about having "API Reference" be the core module, and "Guile Modules" have everything else? I'm still not sure that's the right distinction though. Noah
